La manifestation au Japon dont personne ne parle

Japan’s Ministry of Finance is facing unprecedented backlash. A growing protest movement—the Zaimusho Kaitai Demo, or “Demolish the Ministry of Finance” protest—is rapidly gaining traction online, even as mainstream media stays mostly silent. What’s driving this outrage? And why are influencers, normally quiet on politics, suddenly speaking out?

In this video, we break down the roots of the protest, the Ministry’s controversial economic policies, and the broader frustration simmering in Japan’s political system. From debates over fiscal conservatism and tax policy to whispers of a “deep state,” this story runs deeper than it seems.

Could these protests reshape Japan’s political future—or will the system resist change?

This isn’t just a protest—it’s a symptom of something much deeper. Whether it reshapes Japan’s political landscape remains to be seen, but one thing’s clear: the frustration is real, and it’s growing.

🎥 Watch to the end to get the whole picture,
👍 Like if this gave you something to think about,
🇯🇵 And subscribe to learn more about Japanese politics!

NOTE: I’m not an economist, so if I’ve made any mistakes in explaining economic concepts, I appreciate your understanding 🙏

Attribution
All images of the Prime Ministers are retrieved from the Prime Minister’s Office of Japan, CC BY 4.0. https://www.kantei.go.jp/

Citations of used sources are within the video when necessary.

#japanesepolitics #japan #politics #財務省解体デモ

44 Comments

  1. NOTE: There are a few moments where I misspoke in the video—please refer to the data shown on screen 🙏 Also, I'm sharing the protestors' arguments and I’m NOT an economist by training. My next video will be an updated breakdown of Japan’s political parties 🇯🇵

    If you’re curious about where Japanese politics is headed, hit that subscribe button!
    The best way to support me is by liking the video 👍
    And if you’d like to go the extra mile, you can buy me a coffee ☕ https://buymeacoffee.com/japanyuntaku

  2. Fiscal conservatism? Sound exactly like the austerity policies of the West. You can't tax the wealthy to fuel economy, but you must cut social spending and increase consumer tax to fund the interest payment to the wealthy.

  3. Japan here, we need to abolish Tax Free shopping, focus on ways to avoid importing, stop catering to the old and focus on childcare instead. We also need to out an age limit on politicians and corporate leaders. The pre war generation is still in power and out of touch on how to move the country forward. This country is "Cooked" as the young kids say. Pay raises are almost non existent and we work too hard for what they pay us. I honestly can't see this country coming back to life unless we end up creating something that the world needs.

  4. -Privatizing health care is a very bad idea. It "worked" for the JRs, because the tax payers took the burden.

    -Japan is printing a lot of "money" as it is already.

    -The bureaucrats have been in power (not just Japan) for a long time. Think about it a politician gets a few years. The administration workers have jobs for life.

    -The press is not free in Japan.

    -Why do politicians need several thousand every month for postage stamps?

  5. I'm very glad some outsider foreigners are covering this protest, because everywhere in the world pretends it doesn't exist. The Japanese know what ills their country and will seek to right that wrong!

  6. I feel like the protest are a little to focused not taxcuts. They are right that the government should focus more on growth because to Debt to GDP the government has some control over GDP growth. Politicians get caught up in the debt ,but when you control your own currency and economic policy this is only one side of the coin. I also agree that privatization pretty much never works out in the long run.

  7. Japan needs to change its industrial and economic policies because it can no longer depend on the US market. Japan must seriously consider how to utilize its one trillion dollars—whether to invest in its own economy or continue supporting the US dollar as a global currency for a few more years. If Japan's leaders choose the first option, then opening up and working towards stronger ties with Russia and China may be the way forward. However, it won't be easy for Japan to make this shift, especially considering the perceived weakness of its prime ministers. I worry that Victoria Nuland could potentially influence Japan's decisions negatively, especially if Japan's choices appear to favor the US. Overall, I don't see a bright future ahead for Japan under these circumstances

  8. 2:12 While a 260% debt-to-GDP ratio looks concerning, I believe Japan could pay off at least 60% of that debt if it strategically uses its dollar reserves. A country can sustain a debt level of 300% if it issues its own currency without risking economic collapse. It's frustrating when neoliberal economists claim that taxing the wealthy is harmful, yet they support higher taxes on the poor. If tax increases are necessary, they should primarily target billionaires and millionaires, rather than further burdening ordinary people. It's essential to create a fair tax system that does not disproportionately affect those who are already struggling.

  9. There's an interesting contradiction.

    Critics of the MOF state it is too concerned with fiscal conservatism at the expense of economic growth. Yet, Japan carries an enormous public debt. How did this debt arise? Mostly from economic stimulus packages. What is the purpose of stimulus package? Economic growth. The two most recent economic stimulus programmes were in 2021 in response to the 'rona and Abe's in 2013. Stimulus packages go back to the early '90s.

    Re consumption tax (a VAT/GST/sales tax), it was first introduced in Japan in April 1989, initially at a rate of 3%. It was subsequently increased to 5% in April 1997, 8% in April 2014, and 10% in October 2019. A period of 17 years passed between the increase of '97 and the one of '14. Prior to the tax increase, it was announced. What do soon-to-be-affected consumers do prior to implementation? They buy large-ticket items such as home appliances and cars. Upon the 'shock' of the higher tax, people cut their non-essential discretionary consumption until they mentally adjust to the new rate. Of course, such consumption taxes often exclude or tax at a lower rate essential items such as groceries. Japan's private consumption fell from 59% of GDP in 2000 to 53% in 2024. On the flip side, America's increased from 66.2% to 68.1% during the same period. Other aspects contribute to lower consumption such as smaller home size, restrictions on car ownership, and infrequency of existing home renovation and improvement because housing in Japan is a depreciating asset.

    Is 5, 8, or 10 per cent a too high consumption tax? Putting aside arguments about the efficacy and justness of taxation and examining it in comparison to other countries, Japan's consumption tax is much lower than Europe's VAT, equal to Australia's and Korea's, and is placed amongst sales tax levied in many major US cities, often in conjunction with county and state sales taxes; New York City's aggregate sales tax is 8.875%, LA's is 9.75%, and Chicago's is 10.25%.

    Japan's high median age of 49.8 years (more than 10 years older than US) is a large drag on consumption and economic growth. Generally, adults ages 18 to 45 are the largest consumers. They buy household goods such as major appliances and furniture, cars, homes and have children, which is a large expense. At roughly age 45, typically the start of their highest earning period, they shift from being consumers to being investors/savers as they prepare for retirement. Moreover, in 2001 the share of Japan’s population ages 65 and older was 18.4%. By 2024, this share had grown to 30.2% -that's a 64.1% increase and most demand for Gov't pensions and supported healthcare and other services. Those ages 45 and older low discretionary consumption and younger people's not marrying and having children is a one-two punch on economic growth. Further, just a US industry began to hollow out after JFK's Trade Act in 1962, Japan's industrial production shifted to China and other countries. Japan's present weak yen aids exports, but because of hollowing out the benefit of the weak yen to Japan's economic growth is not as strong given there are fewer industrial producers domestically. But the weak yen increased the cost of essentials such as energy, mineral resources, and food.

    No ministry in Japan can contend with rapidly ageing population and low fertility rate. The Gov't may offer tax breaks and other incentives to encourage marriage and childbirth, but the gains from that are decades away, during which time Japan only ages further.

  10. Good grief. The protest was 30 people. That's 0.000024% of Japan's people. No wonder no one is talking about it.

    I'll give you credit. 400 times more people viewed the protest on your channel than attended it.

  11. The US robbed Japan of all ambitions. Imagine every time you succeeded at something instead of being rewarded you were punished & forced to apologize for doing well. That's basically what America & Japan's relationship is like.

  12. Interesting video, in Germany there were some discussions und raising debt to encourage economic growth. Even though Germanys debt to gdp ratio is way lower than japans, we were lowering it massively by cutting cost and investments over the last decades. This lead to a broken infrastructure and an unemployment ratio of around 5%. After two major crisis (covid and Ukraine) the country is in a bad position with almost no economic growth, "low" consumer buying power and unemployment rising and a high amount of investments needed to restore the old infrastructure. Just a few weeks ago the old mantra of no debt at any price broke and hopefully things will get better.
    I hope japan can also learn from it's mistakes and generate economic growth and prosperity again.

  13. A point on tax revenue records. This is to be expected and needed as inflation is typically a thing. This means tax revenue rises as wages rise and also prises rise, both influence tax revenue. Its like Im reaching a record age every year, nothing out of the ordinary. More important is what the tax rates are and what is taxed. Taxes are made to achive goals like changing people's behaviors and spending or fighting inequality, these effects should be discussed instead of just seeing them as state income. Taxes can slow down an economy if needed but they shouldn't be used to pay of debt primarily. To high taxes will choke of the economy which will caunter act the gdp/debt ratio improvement.

  14. Printing money does not cause inflation by default. Inflation is only happening if the money is spend and the economy cant activate resources or increase efficiency to supply the new demand. This might happen but i would not expect it to. Also japan comes from times of low inflation (or even slight deflation) while having low interest rates. A healthy amount of inflation (define it how you see fit) could reduce the old debt the japanese firms have aquired during the financial crash. All in all its not that easy.

  15. 11:00 yes the protesters have valid concerns but they need progressiv economic key figurs to support their movement by adding the theoretical fundation and discuss on what needs to change specifically to improve the situation. Less conspiracies more scientific reasoning is needed.

  16. The answer is a mix of both inside and outside vectors:

    1. tax tourist with entrance and exit taxes
    2. push for support of companies with tax benefits when focus on development of new modern technologies like AI and quantum (stop holding old dinosaurs like Nissan)
    3. focus on rapid increase on immigration to support the declining birth rate (increase english usage in government support and processes, provide benefits to companies that hire inmigrants) – this will have a long term effect on society support
    4. heavy focus on fining black companies and enforcing more even work life balance (impact on public perception and forces companies to focus on impact versus hours worked)
    5. instead of decreasing tax as a one-time deal, offer bigger refunds annual (this has a better impact on public morale)
    6. increase investment options that dont have such high fees to offer retirement options to people instead of the limited NISA and Ideco options (this lowers dependency on nenkin)

  17. Really good nuisance. I don't know anything about it but I can tell you that's a misunderstanding of what "deep state" means. Similarly it is a thing and can present problems, but any mythologized understanding is a misunderstanding outright.

  18. The reason Japan has not turn to s**t is because of those in charge. The economy is not doing well is because the world economy is also not doing well.

  19. The idea of selling asset to paying debts is bad soon you have nothing left and keep borrowing more . In the end all your asset is belong to foreigner and Japanese are working for foreigners. You let them control your country because they control your economy/ finance .

  20. The Japanese public needs to go out and actually vote if they want something to change. The voter turn out is abysmal every election.

    I agree that the consumption tax should be lowered or removed and they should implement more of a progressive tax bracket to tax the WEALTHY not the working. That’s gonna be hard to do if the LDP is in control

  21. Think about it. If the only way to pay off the debt is by printing money, you foster a culture of inflation. Inflation devalues your investment money and forces you to work in your horrible depressing job until you die. There is no room for growth for younger generation workers and then they get depressed as well. Welcome to Japan.

  22. The bureaucratic permanent state in several countries has become toxic to the overall health of the nation and they need to be restructured into an agency that doesn't become an unclimbable wall. I can already see that Japan will not only hit a point of no return but also face a very very slow decline and its people become working poor, success will only be found outside of Japan and under the umbrella of a few multinational companies (Arasaka from cyberpunk and Caldari State from EvE Online come to mind as parallels or perspective ideas)

  23. You told a great lie: there is a ridiculous inflation hitting Japan for more than 10 years now. It is just not called inflation to not call attention to the overall raising prices.

  24. My solution to this kind of thing, not just in Japan either, is to get rid of central banks, get off fiat and significantly downsize government – as a government's only tasks should be to secure borders, have an army ready for defence of the nation and to act as a referee in citizen and private sector disputes.
    Governments should under no circumstance be in a position where they rule over people.

    Everyone's solutions are always statist in nature and you people need to wake up, we keep trying these statist solutions and everything just gets worse – time to try something new, an anti-state solution.

  25. This is a translation with Google Translate, please forgive me.

    I am Japanese. As one of the people who criticize the Ministry of Finance, I have a few corrections, so I will write them down here.

    If you look at the poster's video, there is a story that the Ministry of Finance can be properly controlled by members of the Diet, but that is not true.

    I will give you several reasons.

    1 There are many people from the Ministry of Finance in the current Diet and the Liberal Democratic Party. And they monopolize party and ministerial positions as represented by Yoichi Miyazawa and Katsunobu Kato, and play a role in reflecting the ideas of the Ministry of Finance in national politics.

    2 There are many members of the Japanese Diet who believe the ideas of bureaucrats and obey the orders of bureaucrats.

    3 I think some people think that it's good to let them lose the election. However, there are powerful people in each constituency in Japan, and as long as they support members of the Ministry of Finance, they will continue to be elected.

    Sorry for the long sentence.

    Google翻訳での翻訳です、お許しください。

    私は日本人です。私は財務省を批判する人間の1人として、いくつか訂正したい部分があるため、ここに記します。

    投稿者様の動画を見ていると、あたかも財務省は国会議員が適切に統制できるものかのような話がありますが、それは事実ではありません。

    理由をいくつか挙げます。

    ①今の国会、取り分け自由民主党の党内には多数の財務省出身者が居ます。そしてか彼らは宮澤洋一や加藤勝信に代表されるように党や大臣の職を独占しており、財務省の考えをそのまま国政に反映させる役割を果たしています。

    ②日本の国会議員の中には、官僚の考えを鵜呑みにして、官僚の言いなりになる人間が多数おります。

    ③では、彼らを選挙で落選させれば良いと考える人も居られると思います。しかし、日本には選挙区ごとに権力者がおり、彼らが財務省国会議員を支持するかぎり、彼らは当選し続けます。

    長文失礼しました。

  26. Funny how when protests breaks out in many Democratic countries, they are the ones the tends to resort to censorship, the very same thing they accused so called dictatorships of doing.

  27. The protesters have a valid concern. I don’t know if they are correct or not but if they are oppressed and they don’t have the opportunity to complain as a group to the government, violence may occur. In a peaceful democracy people must have the freedom of speech. This is paramount.